IEA Section 82 (Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature) was not carried into the BSA

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · applies to offences and proceedings before 1 July 2024

NCRB's official correspondence table lists IEA 82 as deleted (page 17), and BPR&D's gives it no BSA counterpart. There is no provision of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 that replaces it.

IEA 82: Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature

Before 1 July 2024

When any document is produced before any Court, purporting to be a document which, by the law in force for the time being in England or Ireland, would be admissible in proof of any particular in any Court of Justice in England or Ireland, without proof of the seal or stamp or signature authenticating it or of the judicial or official character claimed by the person by whom it purports to be signed, the Court shall presume that such seal, stamp or signature is genuine, and that the person signing it held, at the time when he signed it, the judicial or official character which he claims, and the document shall be admissible for the same purpose for which it would be admissible in England or Ireland.

Which one applies

Under section 170(2) of the BSA, an application, trial, inquiry, investigation, proceeding or appeal already pending on 1 July 2024 is dealt with under the Evidence Act; one begun on or after that date, under the BSA.

Read BSA section 170 →

Judgments decided under IEA 82

They still govern offences committed before 1 July 2024. With no BSA counterpart, they do not carry forward.

Sources

BPR&D is the Bureau of Police Research & Development (Ministry of Home Affairs); NCRB the National Crime Records Bureau. Their correspondence tables are training aids, not law. This page is general information, not legal advice on any case; the bare Acts as published by the Government of India are the authority.