IEA Section 22 is now BSA 20: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · applies to offences and proceedings before 1 July 2024

No changeIEA 22 → BSA 20

BPR&D's comparison records no change in the text, only a new number.

Printed in both official correspondence tables (BPR&D and NCRB).

IEA 22: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

Before 1 July 2024

Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.

BSA 20: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

From 1 July 2024

Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.

Everything BSA 20 replaced →

Which one applies

Under section 170(2) of the BSA, an application, trial, inquiry, investigation, proceeding or appeal already pending on 1 July 2024 is dealt with under the Evidence Act; one begun on or after that date, under the BSA.

Read BSA section 170 →

Judgments decided under IEA 22

The provision moved without a change of substance, so what these judgments decide carries over; cite the new section alongside the old.

Sources

BPR&D is the Bureau of Police Research & Development (Ministry of Home Affairs); NCRB the National Crime Records Bureau. Their correspondence tables are training aids, not law. This page is general information, not legal advice on any case; the bare Acts as published by the Government of India are the authority.