BSA Section 68: Proof where no attesting witness found (formerly IEA 69)

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · in force from 1 July 2024

BSA 68: Proof where no attesting witness found

From 1 July 2024

If no such attesting witness can be found, it must be proved that the attestation of one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting, and that the signature of the person executing the document is in the handwriting of that person.

What it replaced in the Evidence Act

BSA 68 ← IEA 69 · Proof where no attesting witness foundChanged

BPR&D's comparison records a change. Read what changed before relying on the old wording.

What changed, per BPR&D: Words "or if the document purports to have been executed in the United Kingdom" are excluded.

Printed in both official correspondence tables (BPR&D and NCRB).

If no such attesting witness can be found, or if the document purports to have been executed in the United Kingdom, it must be proved that the attestation of one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting, and that the signature of the person executing the document is in the hand writing of that person.

IEA 69 on its own page →

Which one applies

Under section 170(2) of the BSA, an application, trial, inquiry, investigation, proceeding or appeal already pending on 1 July 2024 is dealt with under the Evidence Act; one begun on or after that date, under the BSA.

Read BSA section 170 →

Judgments decided under IEA 69

They remain the law on IEA 69. Where the provision changed in the move, read what changed before relying on one for an offence after 1 July 2024.

Sources

BPR&D is the Bureau of Police Research & Development (Ministry of Home Affairs); NCRB the National Crime Records Bureau. Their correspondence tables are training aids, not law. This page is general information, not legal advice on any case; the bare Acts as published by the Government of India are the authority.