BSA Section 65: Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document Produced (formerly IEA 67)

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · in force from 1 July 2024

BSA 65: Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document Produced

From 1 July 2024

If a document is alleged to be signed or to have been written wholly or in part by any person, the signature or the handwriting of so much of the document as is alleged to be in that person's handwriting must be proved to be in his handwriting.

What it replaced in the Evidence Act

BSA 65 ← IEA 67 · Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document producedNo change

BPR&D's comparison records no change in the text, only a new number.

Printed in both official correspondence tables (BPR&D and NCRB).

If a document is alleged to be signed or to have been written wholly or in part by any person, the signature or the handwriting of so much of the document as is alleged to be in that person’s handwriting must be proved to be in his handwriting.

IEA 67 on its own page →

Which one applies

Under section 170(2) of the BSA, an application, trial, inquiry, investigation, proceeding or appeal already pending on 1 July 2024 is dealt with under the Evidence Act; one begun on or after that date, under the BSA.

Read BSA section 170 →

Judgments decided under IEA 67

They remain the law on IEA 67. Where the provision changed in the move, read what changed before relying on one for an offence after 1 July 2024.

Sources

BPR&D is the Bureau of Police Research & Development (Ministry of Home Affairs); NCRB the National Crime Records Bureau. Their correspondence tables are training aids, not law. This page is general information, not legal advice on any case; the bare Acts as published by the Government of India are the authority.